I’ve reviewed a lot of “free forever” SaaS claims for Websites2Know, and most of them have an asterisk buried somewhere. Didit is the rare one that mostly doesn’t. But the version of Didit that ranks on Google right now — the one every other review site is describing — is already out of date. The company quietly moved its headquarters, closed a new funding round, and shipped features that change the calculus for who should actually use it. This review is built entirely from Didit’s current public pricing page, its published compliance dossier, third-party review platforms, and independent industry analysis, so every figure below is something you can go verify yourself.

What Is Didit, Really?

Didit is an identity and fraud infrastructure platform — one API that covers ID verification, biometric liveness, face matching, AML screening, know-your-business (KYB) checks, transaction monitoring, and wallet screening for crypto. It was founded by identical twins Alberto Rosas (CEO) and Alejandro Rosas (CTO), both former professional tennis players who pivoted into engineering, and it came through Y Combinator’s Winter 2026 batch.

Here’s the part most competing reviews are missing: Didit isn’t the scrappy Barcelona side-project it was when it launched. The company’s headquarters is now listed as San Francisco, and it recently announced a $7.5M seed round to build out identity and fraud infrastructure, with Robinhood Ventures joining Y Combinator as a named backer. Earlier writeups (including our own previous version of this review) cite older raises of $2M–$6M — that’s stale information as of this update.

That matters for a simple reason: identity verification is a trust business. A company that’s still figuring out its funding runway is a riskier long-term bet than one with fresh capital, an EU government attestation, and SOC 2 Type II in hand. Didit now has all three.

Didit Pricing: The Feature-and-Cost Matrix

Before anything else, here’s the plan breakdown, pulled straight from Didit’s public pricing page rather than a stale screenshot.

What actually separates Didit from most identity vendors is that this pricing isn’t a marketing page dressed up to hide a sales call — every one of the 25+ modules has a real, published number attached to it. Here’s the module-level breakdown, because this is the level of detail no other review of Didit currently includes.

Notice what’s on that list now that wasn’t a firm price six months ago: KYB is live at $2.00 per business. One competing review (MakerStack’s) explicitly tells readers to “skip Didit if you need KYB.” That’s no longer accurate advice — it’s a good example of how fast this category moves, and why a stale review can quietly send readers to the wrong tool. If you’re comparing vendors as part of a broader software procurement process, this is exactly the kind of detail that should be re-verified at the point of purchase, not taken from a review published months ago.

How Didit’s Cost Stacks Up Against the Big Names

Reported per-check pricing for legacy KYC vendors is rarely public, so treat the following as directional — pulled from vendor comparison research and publicly reported ranges rather than official rate cards, since Sumsub, Veriff, Onfido, and Persona all gate final pricing behind a sales call.

Even generously rounding down, Didit lands at roughly a third to a fifth of what the legacy players typically charge per check — and that’s before you factor in that 500 checks a month cost nothing at all. For a bootstrapped fintech, that’s not a marginal discount, it’s the difference between shipping KYC on day one or delaying launch until you can afford it.

What Actually Changed: Features Worth Knowing About

The Node-Based Workflow Builder

Didit’s v3 workflow builder lets compliance or ops teams drag and drop modules — document capture, liveness, AML, age estimation — into a decision tree without touching code. This is the single biggest reason non-technical teams can own their own verification logic instead of filing a ticket every time a rule needs to change.

A Free MCP Server for AI Coding Agents

This is the detail that makes Didit interesting to our readers specifically. Didit ships a public MCP (Model Context Protocol) server, free forever, that exposes its verification API directly to AI coding agents like Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Devin. Point one of those agents at Didit’s integration prompt and it can migrate your existing KYC data and wire up the new flow end-to-end. If you’re already experimenting with agentic development, this drops the integration time from days to a single prompt — a meaningfully different experience from copy-pasting SDK snippets.

Compliance Certifications That Actually Stack Up

Didit currently holds SOC 2 Type I and Type II (AICPA), ISO/IEC 27001, iBeta Level 1 PAD for liveness, and alignment with GDPR, DORA, MiCA, AMLD6, and eIDAS 2.0. It’s also formally attested by Spain’s Tesoro, the Bank of Spain, and SEPBLAC as safer than in-person verification — reportedly the only KYC vendor with that specific kind of EU government attestation. For a company barely three years old, that’s a genuinely unusual list, and it’s a meaningful upgrade from the certification picture most reviews describe.

None of this replaces good internal vendor safety diligence before you plug any third party into a flow that touches user identity data, and it definitely doesn’t replace basics like fixing your own SaaS authentication errors before you add a KYC layer on top of a shaky login system. But it’s a real, checkable list of certifications, not marketing copy.

What a Typical Didit Implementation Looks Like

Based on Didit’s published documentation and the integration patterns it’s built for, a standard rollout looks like this: sign up, drag the modules you need into the workflow builder (ID + liveness + face match is the default “full KYC” bundle), and either generate a hosted verification link or drop one of the native SDKs (Web, iOS, Android, React Native, Flutter) into your app. Didit’s own documentation claims a hosted flow can be live in about five minutes, with webhook-based status updates replacing the polling most legacy vendors still require.

On the end-user side, the flow is a document scan followed by a short selfie for passive liveness — no blinking or head-turning required — which typically completes in under a minute according to Didit’s own performance claims and echoed in third-party reviews of the finished flow. That’s consistent with what most modern KYC vendors are converging on; Didit’s differentiator isn’t a novel verification method, it’s making that experience available at a fraction of the price and with genuine self-serve pricing transparency.

Pros and Cons: The Balanced View

Didit vs. the Big Four: Sumsub, Veriff, Onfido, Persona

If your business needs deep KYB workflows in a heavily regulated market today, Sumsub’s maturity is hard to argue with. If raw verification speed at enterprise scale is the priority, Veriff’s pitch still holds up. But for the large majority of startups, marketplaces, and SaaS teams that just need solid identity verification without a six-figure minimum commitment, Didit is doing something the “Big Four” simply refuse to do: showing you the price before you talk to a salesperson.

What Reviewers and the Security Community Are Actually Saying

Didit sits at 4.9/5 on G2 across its reviews, and the recurring theme in that feedback is exactly what you’d expect: ease of use and fast onboarding. One review from a small apparel business described a “tenfold improvement” in onboarding speed after switching. The most common complaint isn’t accuracy — it’s that Didit’s workflow automation is comparatively thin next to legacy platforms; no built-in email triggers, and customization options that some reviewers describe as limited.

Trustpilot tells a slightly more mixed story, which is worth being upfront about instead of hiding it. There’s at least one detailed one-star complaint describing repeated false rejections and a lack of desktop-camera support during verification. Didit’s team responded directly and publicly, tracing the specific issue to a misconfiguration on the partner’s side rather than a platform-wide flaw — but the underlying lesson holds regardless of fault: biometric liveness checks can and do produce false negatives, and if your users skew older, have poor lighting, or use lower-end cameras, you should pilot the flow with real users before rolling it out broadly.

Independent industry analysis is more cautious than the marketing copy, too. Start with Identity’s vendor evaluation scores Didit at 3.6/5 overall, explicitly flagging that “as a young vendor, its track record, certifications, fraud-model maturity, and global coverage are still building” and recommending buyers “validate it carefully with a pilot before relying on it for high-stakes onboarding.” Worth noting: several of the sub-scores that drag that number down are for SSO, federation, and authorization — categories Didit was never trying to compete in, since it’s a KYC platform, not a general identity-and-access-management suite. Judged strictly against what it’s built to do, the picture is stronger than the blended score suggests.

There’s also a broader skepticism worth naming honestly: security-focused communities have grown warier of any startup asking to hold biometric identity data, and that skepticism isn’t unreasonable. A newer, VC-backed vendor carries different risk than a fifteen-year incumbent — not necessarily worse risk, but different, and worth weighing against the cost savings on its own terms rather than dismissing outright.

Who Should Use Didit — and Who Should Skip It

Use Didit if: you’re a startup or SMB that needs identity verification shipped this quarter, not next year’s budget cycle. Fintech founders, marketplace operators verifying sellers, crypto platforms needing KYT alongside KYC, and gig-economy platforms onboarding contractors at volume are all a strong fit. If you’re already deep in AI-assisted development, the free MCP server alone is worth a look.

Skip Didit if: you’re a large, heavily regulated enterprise that needs a decade-plus track record, dedicated compliance consulting, and a vendor your legal team has already vetted through three prior audits. In that world, the incumbents’ higher price buys you institutional maturity that a three-year-old company simply hasn’t had time to build yet, regardless of how good its current certification list looks.

My Verdict

If you’re a fintech founder in 2026 still quoting six-figure enterprise contracts from legacy KYC vendors before you’ve even validated demand, that’s genuinely hard to justify anymore. Didit’s free tier, transparent per-module pricing, and now-priced KYB close most of the gaps that used to make it a “good for MVPs only” recommendation. It’s not the safest choice for a decade-old bank rebuilding its core compliance stack — but for the other 90% of companies reading this, it’s the most sensible starting point in the category right now, and the new funding and certifications make it a much safer bet than it was even six months ago.

FAQ

Is Didit really free?

Yes. Every workspace gets 500 free full KYC checks (ID + liveness + face match + device/IP) every calendar month, permanently, with no credit card required. Unused checks don’t roll over, and the counter resets on the 1st of the month.

How much does Didit cost after the free tier?

A full KYC bundle is $0.33 per check. Individual modules range from $0.02 (transaction monitoring) to $2.00 (business/KYB verification), and you only pay for modules that actually execute in a flow.

Who funds Didit, and is it financially stable?

Didit is backed by Y Combinator and Robinhood Ventures, and recently closed a $7.5M seed round specifically to build out its identity and fraud infrastructure. It’s headquartered in San Francisco.

Does Didit support KYB (Know Your Business)?

Yes, as of its current pricing page. Business verification is priced at $2.00 per company and includes company registry lookup, UBO extraction, officer data, and entity-level AML screening. This is a recent addition — older reviews describing Didit as “no KYB” are out of date.

Is Didit compliant and secure enough for regulated industries?

Didit holds SOC 2 Type I and II, ISO/IEC 27001, and iBeta Level 1 PAD certification, and aligns with GDPR, DORA, MiCA, AMLD6, and eIDAS 2.0. It’s also formally attested by Spanish regulators as safer than in-person verification. That said, independent analysts still recommend piloting before relying on any young vendor for high-stakes onboarding.

Can I migrate from Sumsub, Veriff, or Persona to Didit?

Yes. Didit offers a migration program to map your existing workflows and import historical verification data, and its MCP server lets AI coding agents handle most of the technical migration work directly from a prompt.

Conclusion

The story on Didit has genuinely moved since the last time most of the internet wrote about it. This isn’t a scrappy free-tier gimmick anymore — it’s a funded, certified, San Francisco-headquartered identity platform that happens to still give away 500 checks a month. The gaps that used to be fair criticisms (no KYB, thin certifications, unclear funding) have mostly closed. What’s left is the honest, structural limitation every young vendor carries: less time in the market than Sumsub or Onfido, and a support team that’s still scaling. For most startups and growing businesses, that trade-off is worth it. For a bank rebuilding its core compliance stack, it probably isn’t yet — but check back in a year, because at the pace Didit is moving, that answer may change too.

You Might Also Like

• Top SMS Verification Providers
• How to Fix “SaaS Authentication Failed” Errors
• How to Know If a New Software or AI Tool Is Safe
• Geonode Review
• Is WeLib Safe?
• Is HeyReach Safe?
• Eyezy Review
• Best All-in-One Antivirus Software
• What Is Procurement Software Used For?
• Healthcare Software as a Service